Blog Comments

Kinetica Online is pleased to provide direct links to commentaries from our senior editor Dr. Steven Pelech has posted on other blogs sites. Most of these comments appear on the GenomeWeb Daily Scan website, which in turn highlight interesting blogs that have been posted at numerous sites in the blogosphere since the beginning of 2010. A wide variety of topical subjects are covered ranging from the latest scientific breakthroughs, research trends, politics and career advice. The original blogs and Dr. Pelech’s comments are summarized here under the title of the original blog. Should viewers wish to add to these discussions, they should add their comments at the original blog sites.

The views expressed by Dr. Pelech do not necessarily reflect those of the other management and staff at Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation. However, we wish to encourage healthy debate that might spur improvements in how biomedical research is supported and conducted.

Open-access

Of the People, By the People

The Wellcome Trust, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Max Planck Society announced that they'll be jointly launching a new, open-access scientific journal that will ensure fair, swift and transparent editorial decisions followed by rapid online publication. S. Pelech comments that it is commendable that these agencies that are funding biomedical research are taking a greater initiative to ensure that the fruit of their investments are going to reach a larger number of scientists with open-access publication. Read More...

An App for Papers?

Blogger Joe Pickrell at Genomes Unzipped questioned why researchers publish their work in peer-reviewed journals, which among other things, is costly, time-consuming, and random. Pickrell proposes a system of immediate publication, connected to a social media network, in which readers could recommend papers and researchers could search for them based on the community's opinions or rankings. S. Pelech agrees with Joe Pickrell that the current journal system is fast becoming obsolete on many fronts, including mounting costs, publication speed, labour, environmental problems and the fact that few scientists actually search online for articles based on the reputations of scientific journals. In the end, it is the number of times that a particular scientific paper is quoted that counts and not the impact factor of the journal that it appears in. Read More...

Oh, the Vanity

Apparently authors with connections to industry are more than twice as likely to pay open access fees to make their work free — a bias that some think could lead to preferential publishing and reading of pro-industry results. S. Pelech argues that even with the traditional journal subscription model, there has alway been an "author-pays' element to scientific publishing in most cases and academic authors are just as inclined to publish "favorable work" as industrial authors, because they are subjected to even more pressure to publish or perish that those in industry. Ultimately, a scientific manuscript stil has to pass independent, scrutiny from peer-review before it is published. Read More...