Blog Comments

Kinetica Online is pleased to provide direct links to commentaries from our senior editor Dr. Steven Pelech has posted on other blogs sites. Most of these comments appear on the GenomeWeb Daily Scan website, which in turn highlight interesting blogs that have been posted at numerous sites in the blogosphere since the beginning of 2010. A wide variety of topical subjects are covered ranging from the latest scientific breakthroughs, research trends, politics and career advice. The original blogs and Dr. Pelech’s comments are summarized here under the title of the original blog. Should viewers wish to add to these discussions, they should add their comments at the original blog sites.

The views expressed by Dr. Pelech do not necessarily reflect those of the other management and staff at Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation. However, we wish to encourage healthy debate that might spur improvements in how biomedical research is supported and conducted.

Going 'Beyond the Genome'

The most accurate estimate of the number of human genes is 22,333 human genes, and about 2,000 are highly predictive and medically actionable according to presentations given at BioMed Central's Beyond the Genome conference. S. Pelech wonders why despite the complete sequencing of the human genome for nearly a decade, it is still unresolved exactly how many human genes actually exist. He notes that phosphosites have been identified by mass spectrometry in cell lysate proteins that have since been deleted from Uniprot, while about 4 to 5 percent of human proteins predicted by genome sequencing are still not yet tracked in this repository. Read More...

Move Aside, Genome … It’s the Interactome’s Time to Shine

The New Scientist proposed that after genome sequencing, it’s the interactome (detailed maps maps of interactions between proteins, RNA, and genes) and the phenome (sum total of all traits, from genes to behaviour, that make up a living thing) that will take genetics to the next level. S. Pelech comments that based on data from the 1000 Genomes Project around 60 million human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are projected to exist, and it will likely take several decades before most of the critical SNP's are actually identified and related to phenotype. Moreover, based on current capabilities and efforts expended on the proteomics front, linking the genomics and proteomics data towards a rationale and predictable understanding of phenotype is a herculean effort that will probably take another hundred years. Read More...

Human Genome Times 50 in One Small Flower

The rare white flower from Japan, the Paris japonica, has been found to have the longest genome in the world that with about 150 billion base pairs is about 50 times longer than that of a human being, and blogger Elizabeth Pennisi at ScienceShot suggests that "plants with lots of DNA have more trouble tolerating pollution and extreme climatic extinctions — and they grow more slowly than plants with less DNA, because it takes so long to replicate their genome." Based on other evidence, S. Pelech disagrees and provides several examples of species where there is a poor link if any between the size of a genome and the rate of growth, life span or evolutionary selection for these organisms. Read More...

What to Do with All That Data?

Blogger Mike the Mad Biologist proposed that with genome sequencing getting faster and cheaper, the problem is evolving from how to sequence genomes to storing, processing and best make use of the information. S. Pelech agrees and notes that unless there is a well funded parallel program of biomedical research that can make sense of the genomics data from a proteomics perspective, the genome sequencing efforts will yield primarily correlative data that will offer limited risk assessment at best. Read More...

Hey Scientists! (Don't) Get a Life!

Scott Kern at Johns Hopkins' Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center has observed that researchers — particularly cancer researchers at his institution — have apparently lost their passion for their work, and that patients are suffering as a result. His criticisms has raised the ire of many other bloggers , who have challenged his view. S. Pelech notes that the absence of trainees and established scientists during weekends and evenings in institutions does not mean that they are not still working. With the the advent of personal computers and the Internet, it is not necessary to come to work to read the literature, plan experiments and analyze the results. Read More...